Osborn v. Osborn

Fourth Circuit

Osborn v. Osborn

267 F. App'x 266

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2008·No. No. 07-7623·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against Defendant for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osborn v. Osborn, No. 8:07-cv-02305-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11, 2007; entered Sept. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against Defendant for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osborn v. Osborn, No. 8:07-cv-02305-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11, 2007; entered Sept. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Osborn v. Osborn, 267 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 266 (Osborn v. Osborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related