Osborn v. Osborn

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 27, 2008
• Docket: 07-7623
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7623

ROGER OSBORN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CINDY OSBORN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-02305-AW)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 27, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Osborn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint against Defendant for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osborn

v. Osborn, No. 8:07-cv-02305-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11, 2007;

entered Sept. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -