Osborn v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Osborn v. Lloyd

1 Root 301

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedAugust 15, 1791

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 301 (Osborn v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. Lloyd, 1 Root 301 (Colo. 1791).

Pincite

Opinion

And

by the Court.

Liberty is given to alter his reply; he then replied that at the time of contracting said debt both the parties lived in the state of Connecticut. Demurrer.

It appeared upon inspection, that the defendant was not described as an; absent absconding debtor; which only could enable the plaintiff to sustain this action, the defect was admitted to be fatal and judgment was, that the reply was insufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

And

by the Court.

Liberty is given to alter his reply; he then replied that at the time of contracting said debt both the parties lived in the state of Connecticut. Demurrer.

It appeared upon inspection, that the defendant was not described as an; absent absconding debtor; which only could enable the plaintiff to sustain this action, the defect was admitted to be fatal and judgment was, that the reply was insufficient.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-lloyd-conn-1791.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack