Osborn v. Lloyd
1 Root 301
Opinion
And
Liberty is given to alter his reply; he then replied that at the time of contracting said debt both the parties lived in the state of Connecticut. Demurrer.
It appeared upon inspection, that the defendant was not described as an; absent absconding debtor; which only could enable the plaintiff to sustain this action, the defect was admitted to be fatal and judgment was, that the reply was insufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osborn v. Lloyd, 1 Root 301 (Colo. 1791).
1 Root 301 (Osborn v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howland v. Couch
43 Conn. 47 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1875)