Osborn v. Judd

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Osborn v. Judd

29 F. 96, 24 Blatchf. 167, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2433

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 29 F. 96 (Osborn v. Judd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. Judd, 29 F. 96, 24 Blatchf. 167, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2433 (circtsdny 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Shipman, J.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction against the infringement of a design patent. The design is sufficiently stated in the claim, which is as follows: “The design for a banner rod. herein shown and described, the same consisting of a conventional imitation of a straight twig with the bark on, and slantingly cut ends. ”

I have great doubt whether there is anything which shows genius, or which indicates the work of an inventive mind, and therefore whether there is anything patentable in merely making a banner rod to imitate measurably a straight twig with the bark on. This natural and simple design for a banner rod would, I. think, readily suggest itself to the upholsterer. There is so much reason to suppose that the section which relates to design patents demands the exercise of more genius than is exhibited in the patented design that the motion should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shipman, J.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction against the infringement of a design patent. The design is sufficiently stated in the claim, which is as follows: “The design for a banner rod. herein shown and described, the same consisting of a conventional imitation of a straight twig with the bark on, and slantingly cut ends. ”

I have great doubt whether there is anything which shows genius, or which indicates the work of an inventive mind, and therefore whether there is anything patentable in merely making a banner rod to imitate measurably a straight twig with the bark on. This natural and simple design for a banner rod would, I. think, readily suggest itself to the upholsterer. There is so much reason to suppose that the section which relates to design patents demands the exercise of more genius than is exhibited in the patented design that the motion should be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. 96, 24 Blatchf. 167, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-judd-circtsdny-1886.