Osborn v. Deboard
41 S.E. 985, 115 Ga. 599, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 497
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition alleging two distinct and separate causes of action, neither of which was against all of the defendants, and these causes of action not being so connected with or dependent upon each other as to make a joinder of them necessary or proper, the court did not err in sustaining a demurrer on the ground of multifariousness and misjoinder, although there was one defendant against whom relief was prayed relatively to both causes of action. Stuck v. Alloy Co., 96 Ga. 95.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osborn v. Deboard, 41 S.E. 985, 115 Ga. 599, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 497 (Ga. 1902).
41 S.E. 985 (Osborn v. Deboard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Atlanta v. Cherry
67 S.E.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Collins v. Lambert
2 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Gordy v. Levison & Co.
122 S.E. 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Van Dyke v. Van Dyke
48 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)