Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Osborn v. Deboard

Osborn v. Deboard

41 S.E. 985, 115 Ga. 599, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 497
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 6, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 985 (Osborn v. Deboard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborn v. Deboard, 41 S.E. 985, 115 Ga. 599, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 497 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The plaintiffs’ petition alleging two distinct and separate causes of action, neither of which was against all of the defendants, and these causes of action not being so connected with or dependent upon each other as to make a joinder of them necessary or proper, the court did not err in sustaining a demurrer on the ground of multifariousness and misjoinder, although there was one defendant against whom relief was prayed relatively to both causes of action. Stuck v. Alloy Co., 96 Ga. 95.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Atlanta v. Cherry
67 S.E.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Collins v. Lambert
2 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Gordy v. Levison & Co.
122 S.E. 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Van Dyke v. Van Dyke
48 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 985, 115 Ga. 599, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-deboard-ga-1902.