Osborn v. Colwell

21 A. 103, 17 R.I. 196, 1890 R.I. LEXIS 74
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedDecember 27, 1890
StatusPublished

This text of 21 A. 103 (Osborn v. Colwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborn v. Colwell, 21 A. 103, 17 R.I. 196, 1890 R.I. LEXIS 74 (R.I. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question raised by the demurrer to the complainant’s bill is whether a suit in equity against an assignee by a creditor whose claim has been disallowed is the proper form of suit to be brought against an assignee under Pub. Laws R. I. cap. 820, § 1, of July 30, 1889, amending cap. 631, § 3, of April 20, 1887. We think it is. Such a suit is in *198 effect a suit to enforce the trusts of the assignment in favor of the person bringing it, and as such is properly brought in equity.

Ezra K. Parker, for complainant. Walter H. Barney, for respondent.

We do not think the assignor is a necessary party to such a suit.

Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A. 103, 17 R.I. 196, 1890 R.I. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-colwell-ri-1890.