Osborn v. City of Waterbury

184 A.3d 1214, 329 Conn. 901
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 30, 2018
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 A.3d 1214 (Osborn v. City of Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborn v. City of Waterbury, 184 A.3d 1214, 329 Conn. 901 (Colo. 2018).

Opinion

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 239, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. In reversing the judgment of the trial court, did the Appellate Court properly determine that expert testimony was necessary to establish the standard of care?

"2. Did the plaintiffs receive adequate notice of the need for expert testimony to determine the scope of the duty of care such that a directed judgment was appropriate in this case?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osborn v. Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.3d 1214, 329 Conn. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-city-of-waterbury-conn-2018.