Osborn v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Osborn v. City of Waterbury

184 A.3d 1214, 329 Conn. 901

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 30, 2018·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 239, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. In reversing the judgment of the trial court, did the Appellate Court properly determine that expert testimony was necessary to establish the standard of care?

"2. Did the plaintiffs receive adequate notice of the need for expert testimony to determine the scope of the duty of care such that a directed judgment was appropriate in this case?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 239, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. In reversing the judgment of the trial court, did the Appellate Court properly determine that expert testimony was necessary to establish the standard of care?

"2. Did the plaintiffs receive adequate notice of the need for expert testimony to determine the scope of the duty of care such that a directed judgment was appropriate in this case?"

Osborn v. City of Waterbury, 184 A.3d 1214, 329 Conn. 901 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

184 A.3d 1214 (Osborn v. City of Waterbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related