Osborn v. Cardeza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Osborn v. Cardeza

128 N.Y.S. 1137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 128 N.Y.S. 1137 (Osborn v. Cardeza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. Cardeza, 128 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, so that it shall provide that the referee’s fees and the entire amount of the stenographer’s fees upon the accounting, as fixed by the court at 'Special Term, shall be paid by defendants out of the funds found to be in their hands as accounting trustees, and by providing that neither party to this action shall recover the costs of the action as against the other, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs. See, also, 118 App. Div. 899, 103 N. Y. Supp. 1136; 121 App. Div. 908, 106 N. Y. Supp. 1139.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, so that it shall provide that the referee’s fees and the entire amount of the stenographer’s fees upon the accounting, as fixed by the court at 'Special Term, shall be paid by defendants out of the funds found to be in their hands as accounting trustees, and by providing that neither party to this action shall recover the costs of the action as against the other, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs. See, also, 118 App. Div. 899, 103 N. Y. Supp. 1136; 121 App. Div. 908, 106 N. Y. Supp. 1139.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-cardeza-nyappdiv-1911.