Osborn-Jenkyn v. Brasted
This text of 11 A.D.2d 1051 (Osborn-Jenkyn v. Brasted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and [1052]*1052property, arising out of an intersection collision, the defendants appeal from an order of the City Court of New Rochelle, dated November 16, 1959, granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment under rule 1.13 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after trial and not upon a motion for summary judgment. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.2d 1051, 205 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-jenkyn-v-brasted-nyappdiv-1960.