Osbaldo Gonzales v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 2025
Docket07-24-00306-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Osbaldo Gonzales v. the State of Texas (Osbaldo Gonzales v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osbaldo Gonzales v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-24-00306-CR

OSBALDO GONZALES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 286th District Court Hockley County, Texas Trial Court No. 21-02-9974, Honorable Pat Phelan, Presiding

February 7, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Osbaldo Gonzales, appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual

assault of a child1 and sentence to fifty years of confinement. Appellant’s brief was

originally due January 2, 2025, but was not filed. By letter of January 13, 2025, we

admonished Appellant’s counsel that failure to file a brief by January 23 would result in

the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(2)(B). without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has neither filed a brief nor had any

further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall

determine the following:

1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether Appellant is indigent;

3. if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary

arrangements for filing a brief;

4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;

5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;

7. whether new counsel should be appointed; and

8. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect

Appellant’s brief to be filed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by March 10, 2025.

If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;

the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before February 21, 2025, he is

directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial

court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.021
Texas PE § 22.021(a)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Osbaldo Gonzales v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osbaldo-gonzales-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.