Osaka Trading Co. v. Tokyo International Trading Co.
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered on or about August 15, 1988, which, inter alia, directed defendants Tokyo International Trading Company, Inc., American ZEP, Inc., and Perry to proceed to arbitration, unanimously modified, on the law, to delete such direction, and is otherwise affirmed, without costs.
[410] All parties to the appeal are in agreement that the above-named defendants are not parties to the arbitration agreement, and thus cannot be compelled to participate in the arbitration directed by IAS. We modify the order on appeal only to correct this apparent oversight. Concur — Ross, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
147 A.D.2d 409 (Osaka Trading Co. v. Tokyo International Trading Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.