Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

1925 OK 718, 239 P. 581, 113 Okla. 114, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 910

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Okla. 7 →

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 15, 1925·No. 16079·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, for the reason no notice was given of intention to appeal. An examination of the record shows that no notice was given. Section 782, C. O.S. 1921, is- mandatory, and the appeal is dismissed. Nichols v. Lonsdale, 109 Okla. 59, 234 Pac. 752; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 Pac. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 Pac. 211; Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 Pac. 867; Holbert v. Patrick, 72 Okla. 25, 177 Pac. 566.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, for the reason no notice was given of intention to appeal. An examination of the record shows that no notice was given. Section 782, C. O.S. 1921, is- mandatory, and the appeal is dismissed. Nichols v. Lonsdale, 109 Okla. 59, 234 Pac. 752; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 Pac. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 Pac. 211; Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 Pac. 867; Holbert v. Patrick, 72 Okla. 25, 177 Pac. 566.

Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co., 1925 OK 718, 239 P. 581, 113 Okla. 114, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 910 (Okla. 1925).

Pincite

1925 OK 718 (Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related