Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

1925 OK 718, 239 P. 581, 113 Okla. 114, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 910
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 15, 1925
Docket16079
StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK 718 (Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co., 1925 OK 718, 239 P. 581, 113 Okla. 114, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 910 (Okla. 1925).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, for the reason no notice was given of intention to appeal. An examination of the record shows that no notice was given. Section 782, C. O.S. 1921, is- mandatory, and the appeal is dismissed. Nichols v. Lonsdale, 109 Okla. 59, 234 Pac. 752; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123, 209 Pac. 319; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156, 175 Pac. 211; Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22, 217 Pac. 867; Holbert v. Patrick, 72 Okla. 25, 177 Pac. 566.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkins v. Lynholm
1922 OK 202 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Nichols v. Lonsdale
1925 OK 239 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Holbert v. Patrick
1918 OK 163 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Crawford v. Shintaffer
1923 OK 521 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Miller v. Brownfield
1918 OK 542 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK 718, 239 P. 581, 113 Okla. 114, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osage-oil-refining-co-v-interstate-pipe-co-okla-1925.