Osage Homestead Corp. v. City of New Florence

Missouri Court of Appeals

Osage Homestead Corp. v. City of New Florence

761 S.W.2d 291, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1988 WL 132627

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 1988·No. No. 54375·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in plaintiffs action for breach of contract. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears; and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in plaintiffs action for breach of contract. We affirm. The trial court’s judgment is reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears; and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Osage Homestead Corp. v. City of New Florence, 761 S.W.2d 291, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1988 WL 132627 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

761 S.W.2d 291 (Osage Homestead Corp. v. City of New Florence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.