Osa Igbinoba v. Accura Engineering and Consulting Services, Inc.

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 28, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1695. OSA IGBINOBA v. ACCURA ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

In this action for breach of contract and related claims, the trial court entered a final judgment awarding the plaintiff a total of $9,600 plus unspecified court costs. Pro se defendant Osa Igbinoba then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), (b); Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357, 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Igbinoba’s failure to comply with the discretionary review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jennings, 235 Ga. App. at 357.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/28/2024

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.