Osa Alohaneke v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Osa Alohaneke v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-18-00102-CR
Trial court case number: 15-DCR-069234
Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County
Appellant, Osa Alohaneke, has filed a pro se motion to obtain a copy of trial transcripts “to prepare, present, and prosecute issues on appeal not raised in counsel’s Appellate Brief.” Appellant is represented by appointed counsel on appeal, and counsel has filed a brief on appellant’s behalf. Appellant is not entitled to hybrid representation in this appeal. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 921–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (stating defendant not entitled to hybrid representation, that is, “representation partly by counsel and partly by self”); see also Ford v. State, 794 S.W.2d 863, 868 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1990, pet. ref’d) (explaining appellant represented by counsel has right to file pro se brief in addition to counsel’s brief only when counsel presents “a frivolous appeal brief”).1 Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s Julie Countiss Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __January 24, 2019___
1 Appellant’s appointed counsel has not filed a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osa Alohaneke v. State (Osa Alohaneke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.