O.S. v. E.S.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

O.S. v. E.S.

205 So. 3d 1244, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 38

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 27, 2015·No. 2110621·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte O.S., 205 So.3d 1233 (Ala.2014). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the Walker Circuit Court and remand the cause for the entry of a judgment dismissing E.S.’s action against O.S, and J.A.S. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction,

[1245] REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, • MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte O.S., 205 So.3d 1233 (Ala.2014). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we hereby reverse the judgment of the Walker Circuit Court and remand the cause for the entry of a judgment dismissing E.S.’s action against O.S, and J.A.S. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction,

[1245] REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and THOMAS, • MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

O.S. v. E.S., 205 So. 3d 1244, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 38 (Ala. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

205 So. 3d 1244 (O.S. v. E.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related