Orzel v. POLLAS FAMILY MARKET
723 N.W.2d 901, 477 Mich. 953
Opinion
John ORZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
POLLAS FAMILY MARKET and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Shield Risk Services, Defendants-Appellants, and
Second Injury Fund, Total & Permanent Disability Provision, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orzel v. POLLAS FAMILY MARKET, 723 N.W.2d 901, 477 Mich. 953 (Mich. 2006).
723 N.W.2d 901 (Orzel v. POLLAS FAMILY MARKET) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.