Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 23, 2015
Docket05-14-00446-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus (Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order entered September 23, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00446-CV

ORYON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ORYON TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellant

V.

M. RICHARD MARCUS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-01252

ORDER We REINSTATE the appeal.

On May 9, 2014, we abated this appeal after being informed that appellant Oryon

Technologies, Inc. had filed a petition for bankruptcy. Before the Court is the motion of

appellants’ counsel to withdraw. Attached to the motion is the September 4, 2015 order of the

bankruptcy court dismissing the bankruptcy cases filed by each appellant.

We GRANT the motion to withdraw. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove

attorneys: Charles L. Perry, Mark A. Shoffner, Benjamin J. Setnick, Crystal L. Jamison and the

law firm Andrews Kurth, LLP, as counsel for appellants.

Appellants may only appear before this Court through an attorney. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 7;

Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996). Accordingly, we ORDER appellants to file, WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of

this order, the name, State Bar number, mailing address, email address, and telephone number of

new counsel. We caution appellants that failure to provide the required information within the

time specified will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp.
937 S.W.2d 455 (Texas Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Oryon Technologies, Inc. and Oryon Technologies, LLC v. M. Richard Marcus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oryon-technologies-inc-and-oryon-technologies-llc-v-m-richard-marcus-texapp-2015.