Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners
313 U.S. 546, 61 S. Ct. 1088
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Semler v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608; Brown v. Massachusetts, 308 U. S. 504. (2) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners, 313 U.S. 546, 61 S. Ct. 1088 (1941).
313 U.S. 546 (Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Person v. Association of Bar of City of New York
414 F. Supp. 133 (E.D. New York, 1976)