Orvis v. Curtiss
28 N.Y.S. 728, 8 Misc. 681, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 287
Opinion
The justice had no jurisdiction to render the judgment he did in this case, because he rendered it after the time limited by law for his doing so. This appears from the return itself. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Orvis v. Curtiss, 28 N.Y.S. 728, 8 Misc. 681, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 287 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
28 N.Y.S. 728 (Orvis v. Curtiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Railway Express Co. v. Eddy
128 Misc. 502 (Albany City Court, 1926)
Berliner v. M. Zimmermann Co.
54 Misc. 246 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Van Valis v. Charcona
40 Misc. 226 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Penniman v. LaGrange
23 Misc. 121 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)