Orville W. Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Company, a Corporation

Fourth Circuit

Orville W. Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Company, a Corporation

354 F.2d 240

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1965·No. 10077_1·Published

Opinion

354 F.2d 240

Orville W. WALKER, Appellant,
v.
MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 10077.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued December 9, 1965.

Decided December 16, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; John A. Field, Jr., Judge.

Richard M. Markus, Cleveland, Ohio (Sindell, Sindell, Bourne, Markus, Stern & Spero, Cleveland, Ohio, and Kaufman & Browning, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

Robert L. Elkins, Charleston, W. Va., (W. T. O'Farrell, John R. Lukens, and Jackson, Kelly, Holt & O'Farrell, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MAXWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties filed herein and the oral arguments of counsel presented at the bar of the court, we find no substantial error commanding reversal. Therefore the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

354 F.2d 240

Orville W. WALKER, Appellant,
v.
MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 10077.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued December 9, 1965.

Decided December 16, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; John A. Field, Jr., Judge.

Richard M. Markus, Cleveland, Ohio (Sindell, Sindell, Bourne, Markus, Stern & Spero, Cleveland, Ohio, and Kaufman & Browning, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

Robert L. Elkins, Charleston, W. Va., (W. T. O'Farrell, John R. Lukens, and Jackson, Kelly, Holt & O'Farrell, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MAXWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties filed herein and the oral arguments of counsel presented at the bar of the court, we find no substantial error commanding reversal. Therefore the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Orville W. Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Company, a Corporation, 354 F.2d 240 (4th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

354 F.2d 240 (Orville W. Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.