Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/ORTUNO v. State

ORTUNO v. State

32 So. 3d 121, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2009 WL 3787795
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 2009
Docket2D08-4720
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 So. 3d 121 (ORTUNO v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ORTUNO v. State, 32 So. 3d 121, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2009 WL 3787795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 898 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (applying Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) to preserve error regarding lack of written order that specified trial court’s findings on probation violations).

FULMER, NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hines v. State
125 So. 3d 999 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 So. 3d 121, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2009 WL 3787795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortuno-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.