ORTUNO v. State

32 So. 3d 121, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2009 WL 3787795
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 2009·No. 2D08-4720·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 898 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (applying Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2) to preserve error regarding lack of written order that specified trial court’s findings on probation violations).

FULMER, NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORTUNO v. State, 32 So. 3d 121, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2009 WL 3787795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

32 So. 3d 121 (ORTUNO v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hines v. State
125 So. 3d 999 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)