Ortlip v. State
This text of Ortlip v. State (Ortlip v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DAVID ORTLIP, § § Defendant Below, § No. 108, 2018 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1610002029 (S) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 18, 2018 Decided: June 25, 2018
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
This 25th day of June 2018, it appears to the Court that:
(1) This appeal arises from a Superior Court order sentencing the appellant,
David Ortlip, for a violation of probation. On May 1, 2018, the Chief Deputy Clerk
issued a notice directing Ortlip to show cause why this appeal should not be
dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief and appendix.
(2) In his response to the notice to show cause, Ortlip requested an
extension of time to file his opening brief and appendix. By Order dated May 16,
2018, the Court granted Ortlip an extension until June 15, 2018. The Court also
ordered that there would no further extensions and that failure to file an opening
brief by June 15, 2018 would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. (3) Ortlip has not filed an opening brief and appendix. For that reason, and
in accordance with the May 16, 2018 Order, this appeal will be dismissed without
further notice.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),
that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ortlip v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortlip-v-state-del-2018.