Ortiz v. Warfield
This text of Ortiz v. Warfield (Ortiz v. Warfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JUAN J. ORTIZ, SR., § § No. 435, 2016 Plaintiff Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware PAUL WARFIELD, et al., § § C.A. No. N16A-05-001 Defendants Below- § Appellees. §
Submitted: January 27, 2017 Decided: March 2, 2017
Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
This 2nd day of March 2017, upon consideration of the parties’ brief and the
record below, the Court concludes that the judgment below should be affirmed on
the basis of the Superior Court’s well-reasoned decision dated July 28, 2016. As a
matter of law, the Superior Court did not err in concluding that the appellant’s
notice of appeal, which was filed on June 1, 2016, from a Court of Common Pleas’
order entered on April 12, 2016 was untimely.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ortiz v. Warfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-warfield-del-2017.