Ortiz v. U.S Dept. of Homeland Security

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 18, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-10327·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LUIS ORTIZ, Petitioner, 22 Civ. 10327 (JHR) ve ORDER TO ANSWER SeURITY OF HOMELAND 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Respondent. JENNIFER H. REARDEN, District Judge: The Court, having examined the petition filed in the above-captioned action, which Petitioner filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York that this Order has been issued. Within 60 days of the date of this Order, the U.S. Attorney’s Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the petition. Petitioner may file reply papers, if any, within 30 days of the date Petitioner is served with Respondent’s answer. The Clerk of Court shall mail this Order, along with Judge Rearden’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases and Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases, to the pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2023 New York, New York

JENNIFER H. REARDEN United States District Judge

Effective: January 9, 2023

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PRACTICES IN CIVIL PRO SE CASES JENNIFER H. REARDEN, United States District Judge

Pro Se Office United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 (212) 805-0175

COMMUNICATIONS

1. Pro se parties may not contact the Court directly. All communications with the Court by a pro se party (including written, electronic, and telephone communications) should be addressed to the Pro Se Office.

2. Each pro se party must maintain a current mailing address of record. If a pro se party’s mailing address changes, the pro se party must inform the Pro Se Office promptly. Pro se parties may use the S.D.N.Y. Notice of Change of Address Form for this purpose. If a pro se party fails to maintain a current mailing address of record, the pro se party’s claims may be dismissed.

3. Unless otherwise provided in these Rules and Practices, communications with the Court by parties represented by counsel in a civil pro se case shall be governed by Judge Rearden’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases.

4. All requests for adjournments or extensions of time must be made in writing and must state: (1) the original date; (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extensions of time; (3) whether those previous requests were granted or denied; (4) the reason(s) for the requested extension; (5) whether the adversary consents, and, if not, the reason(s) given by the adversary for declining to consent; and (6) the date of the parties’ next scheduled appearance before the Court, as well as any other existing deadlines, and whether the requested adjournment or extension would affect those other deadlines or any other scheduled dates.

Requests for extensions of deadlines regarding a matter that has been referred to a Magistrate Judge shall be addressed to that Magistrate Judge. Absent an emergency, any request for an extension or adjournment shall be made at least two business days prior to the scheduled deadline or date. Requests for extensions made after the expiration of the original deadline or date will ordinarily be denied. FILING OF PAPERS

5. No documents or court filings may be sent directly to Chambers. A pro se party may instead file papers with the Court by:

i. Delivering them in person to the Pro Se Office at 40 Foley Square, Room 105, New York, New York 10007;

ii. Mailing them to the Pro Se Intake Office at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007 (Attention: Pro Se Intake);

iii. Emailing them as an attachment in PDF format to Temporary_Pro_Se_ Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov, in which case the pro se party should follow the instructions contained in the April 1, 2020 Addendum to the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions; or

iv. Filing them on ECF, if the pro se party has filed a Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing (available online and in the Pro Se Office) and been granted such permission by the Court.

6. To ensure timely service of documents, including Court orders, non-incarcerated pro se parties are encouraged to consent to receive electronic service through ECF. To do so, a pro se party should review the Pro Se Consent to Receive Documents Electronically instructions, and then submit a Consent to Electronic Service.

7. If a pro se party consents to electronic service, or if the Court grants a Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing on ECF under Rule 5.iv, that party will not receive hard copies of any document filed on ECF or served by email.

8. Absent a pro se party consenting to receipt of electronic service, counsel in pro se cases must serve a pro se party with a paper copy of any document that is filed electronically and must file with the Court a separate Affidavit of Service. Submissions filed without proof of service on the pro se party will not be considered.

DISCOVERY

9. All requests for discovery by a pro se party should be sent to counsel for the party from whom discovery is sought (if the party is represented by counsel). Discovery requests should not be sent to the Court. In the event of any discovery disputes, the parties are required to confer in an effort to resolve the dispute without Court intervention. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute, either party may file a letter-motion, not to exceed six double-spaced pages, explaining the nature of the dispute and requesting an informal conference. The opposing party must promptly file any responsive letter, which shall not exceed six double-spaced pages. MOTIONS

10. Any requests for relief, other than requests for an informal conference to address a discovery dispute as per Rule 9, shall be submitted in the form of a motion that conforms to the requirements of Local Civil Rule 7.1 of the S.D.N.Y. Local Rules.

11. Filing and Service. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, oppositions to motions shall be served and filed within four weeks of receipt of the motion papers, and reply papers, if any, shall be served and filed within two weeks of receipt of opposition papers. Motion papers are deemed filed and served pursuant to this Rule in accordance with the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the S.D.N.Y. Local Rules. Pursuant to Sections 3 and 9 of the Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions:

i. Where documents are filed on ECF, a document filed electronically is deemed filed on the date and time stated on the Notice of Electronic Filing from the Court. Electronic service is complete for parties who are ECF users and have received a Notice of Electronic Filing (and for service on pro se parties, only following the Court’s approval of a Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, as per Rule 5.iv, or the pro se party’s consent to electronic service according to Rule 6, above).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. U.S Dept. of Homeland Security, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Ortiz v. U.S Dept. of Homeland Security (Ortiz v. U.S Dept. of Homeland Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hertz Corp. v. Friend
559 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)