Ortiz v. State

269 S.W. 1046, 99 Tex. Crim. 347
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 1925·No. No. 9228.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant is under conviction for the sale of intoxicating liquor with punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

By the terms of Article 903, C. C. P., one of the requisites of a recognizance or bond pending appeal from a conviction in felony cases is that the offense of which accused was charged and convicted shall be described. In the present ease the recognizance recites that appellant was charged and convicted of the "offense of violation of the prohibition law.” There is no such offense as this known to our statutes.

Because of this defect in the recognizance the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. State, 269 S.W. 1046, 99 Tex. Crim. 347 (Tex. 1925).

269 S.W. 1046 (Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.