Ortiz v. State

689 So. 2d 353, 1997 WL 61026
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 1997·No. 95-03622·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

689 So.2d 353 (1997)

Manfredo ORTIZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-03622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 14, 1997.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence. Because this court lacks the authority to review the trial court's order denying the appellant's motion for case reassignment, we are precluded from reaching the substantive issues raised. Wild v. Dozier, 672 So.2d 16, 18 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. State, 689 So. 2d 353, 1997 WL 61026 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 353 (Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Polanco v. Citizens Property Ins. Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
1-888-Traffic Schools v. Chief Cir. Judge
734 So. 2d 413 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Green v. State
694 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)