Ortiz v. Silver Dollar Transit Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ortiz v. Silver Dollar Transit Inc.

10 A.D.3d 585, 781 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11192

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered June 27, 2003, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate an underlying dismissal of their action for counsel’s failure to appear at a preliminary conference, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find no improvident exercise of discretion by the court’s denial of relief from the default granted under 22 NYCRR 202.27. Plaintiffs simply failed to establish the existence of a meritorious cause of action. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered June 27, 2003, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate an underlying dismissal of their action for counsel’s failure to appear at a preliminary conference, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find no improvident exercise of discretion by the court’s denial of relief from the default granted under 22 NYCRR 202.27. Plaintiffs simply failed to establish the existence of a meritorious cause of action. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Ortiz v. Silver Dollar Transit Inc., 10 A.D.3d 585, 781 N.Y.S.2d 896, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

10 A.D.3d 585 (Ortiz v. Silver Dollar Transit Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related