Ortiz v. Scully
This text of 202 A.D.2d 511 (Ortiz v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the appellant Charles J. Scully, as Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, dated September 5, 1991, which found the petitioner guilty of violations of certain disciplinary rules, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated March 25, 1992, which denied the appellants’ motion to dismiss the proceeding as time-barred, and annulled the determination.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
The filing of the order to show cause with the clerk of the Supreme Court on January 2, 1992, did not commence the instant proceeding (see, CPLR former 304). The proceeding was commenced by service of the order to show cause and petition upon the appellant in February 1992, more than four months after the determination under review, and is, therefore, time-barred. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 511, 610 N.Y.S.2d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-scully-nyappdiv-1994.