Ortiz v. Rivera

193 A.D.2d 440, 597 N.Y.S.2d 326
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 1993·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.) entered May 14, 1992, which granted plaintiff’s motion to quash the subpoena served by defendant upon nonparty witness-attorney, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that the proposed deposition [441]*441regarding the collateral issue of the copying of decedent’s medical record by plaintiffs daughter while an employee of defendant was not relevant, necessary or material to the litigation (see, Stephen-Leedom Carpet Co. v Arkwright-Boston Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co., 101 AD2d 574, lv dismissed 64 NY2d 754). Further, as the referring attorney herein had been contacted in his capacity as an attorney, for the purpose of obtaining legal advice and services, the attorney client privilege precluded his testimony (CPLR 3101 [b]; 4503; see, Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 NY2d 62, 68-69). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. Rivera, 193 A.D.2d 440, 597 N.Y.S.2d 326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 440 (Ortiz v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weingarten v. Braun
2018 NY Slip Op 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Surgical Design Corp. v. Correa
21 A.D.3d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Radovic v. City of New York
168 Misc. 2d 58 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)