Ortiz v. Presbyterian Hospital

247 A.D.2d 287, 668 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1528

This text of 247 A.D.2d 287 (Ortiz v. Presbyterian Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortiz v. Presbyterian Hospital, 247 A.D.2d 287, 668 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered February 6, 1997, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly denied summary judgment since the affidavits and testimony of the various medical experts demonstrate that, at the very least, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the DPT injections were contraindicated, and as to whether such injections proximately caused plaintiffs brain damage and mental retardation (see, Farkas v Saary, 191 AD2d 178).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farkas v. Saary
191 A.D.2d 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 287, 668 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-presbyterian-hospital-nyappdiv-1998.