Ortiz v. Mantello
This text of 268 A.D.2d 869 (Ortiz v. Mantello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following a tier II hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty with an explanation to violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting prisoners from being out of place. The misbehavior report stated that petitioner was found in the yard rather than in the print shop for which he was scheduled all day. The Hearing Officer, relying on the misbehavior report and petitioner’s own admissions, found petitioner guilty of the charged rule violation. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding which was transferred to this Court.
Initially, given petitioner’s plea of guilty to the charge of being out of place, we note that he is precluded from challenging the determination of his guilt on this charge as not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Anderson v Goord, 262 AD2d 896). In any event, the misbehavior report as well as petitioner’s own admissions provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of the charged violation.
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D.2d 869, 700 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-mantello-nyappdiv-2000.