Ortiz v. Knighton

14 A.D.2d 679, 219 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8795
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 A.D.2d 679 (Ortiz v. Knighton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortiz v. Knighton, 14 A.D.2d 679, 219 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Plaintiff’s vehicle was struck in the rear by defendant’s vehicle and no issue is raised on this motion as to the course and speed of the vehicles, or the surrounding circumstances. Nevertheless, an issue of fact exists whether defendant was negligent, that is, whether what defendant eoncededly did was in fact a breach of the duty of due care. (Hajder v. G. & G. [680]*680Moderns, 13 A D 2d 651.) The failure of defendant to submit a personal affidavit giving an exculpating version of the accident does not eliminate the factual question of negligence (see Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381, 383). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Fren v. Russell
71 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 679, 219 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-knighton-nyappdiv-1961.