Ortiz v. King & Co.
555 So. 2d 471, 1990 La. LEXIS 287, 1990 WL 4913
This text of 555 So. 2d 471 (Ortiz v. King & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ortiz v. King & Co., 555 So. 2d 471, 1990 La. LEXIS 287, 1990 WL 4913 (La. 1990).
Opinion
Granted.
Plaintiff was not a “part time employee.” R.S. 23:1021(9) provides:
“ ‘Part-time employee’ means an employee who as a condition of his hiring knowingly accepts employment that (a) customarily provides for less than forty hours per work week, and (b) that is classified by the employer as a part-time position.”
The union contract provided for a work week of forty hours, eight hours a day, and there is no evidence that the employer classified the position as “part time.”
Judgments of the courts below, 550 So.2d 1262, are reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ortiz v. King & Co.
550 So. 2d 1262 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
555 So. 2d 471, 1990 La. LEXIS 287, 1990 WL 4913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-king-co-la-1990.