Ortiz v. Henriquez
This text of 41 F. App'x 516 (Ortiz v. Henriquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Milagros Ortiz, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Duffy, J.) granting summary judgment for the defendants. Ortiz only preserves her claim against the arresting officer. The district court ruled that the arresting officer was entitled to qualified immunity because his conduct was “objectively reasonable.” We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortiz v. Henriquez, et al., 99 Civ. 3268 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-henriquez-ca2-2002.