Ortiz v. Food MacHinery of America, Inc.
This text of 125 A.D.3d 507 (Ortiz v. Food MacHinery of America, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), *508 entered June 4, 2014, which granted third-party defendant La Minerva Group SRL’s motion to dismiss the third-party complaint as against it on the basis of lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The sole argument advanced in support of reversal is that the motion court erred in considering the affidavit submitted by La Minerva in support of its motion to dismiss, because the affidavit was not accompanied by a translator’s affidavit. However, the witness’s affidavit is in English, and La Minerva’s counsel represents that the witness, an Italian citizen, speaks English, and communicated with counsel in English concerning the drafting of the affidavit (see CPLR 2101 [b]; Eustaquio v 860 Cortlandt Holdings, Inc., 95 AD3d 548 [1st Dept 2012]; Reyes v Arco Wentworth Mgt. Corp., 83 AD3d 47, 54 [2d Dept 2011]). An Italian translation of the affidavit was provided for the benefit of the Italian notary, but the witness provided his sworn statement in English. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Clark, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2014 NY Slip Op 31868(U).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.3d 507, 5 N.Y.S.3d 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-food-machinery-of-america-inc-nyappdiv-2015.