Ortiz v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.
159 A. 376, 18 Del. Ch. 439, 1931 Del. LEXIS 3
Opinion
The decree of the Chancellor will be affirmed.
We can see no reason for writing an opinion in this [442] case because the conclusion of the lower court is fully supported by prior decisions in this State. Bryan, et al., v. Aiken, et al., 10 Del. Ch. 458, 86 A. 674, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 477; du Pont, et al., v. Peyton, et al., 15 Del. Ch. 255, 136 A. 149.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ortiz v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co., 159 A. 376, 18 Del. Ch. 439, 1931 Del. LEXIS 3 (Del. 1931).
159 A. 376 (Ortiz v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steel v. Steel
125 A.2d 261 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1956)
Cox v. Sellers
28 A.2d 679 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1942)