Ortiz v. Codella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ortiz v. Codella

123 A.D.3d 453, 998 N.Y.S.2d 338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2014

Docket13671N 305498/12

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 453 (Ortiz v. Codella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ortiz v. Codella, 123 A.D.3d 453, 998 N.Y.S.2d 338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendant Codella’s motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County pursuant to CPLR 504 (3), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for malicious prosecution and violation of his civil rights under 42 USC § 1983, alleging that he was wrongfully convicted of a murder he did not commit based on serious misconduct by the individual defendants, then employed by the New York City Housing Authority and New York City Police Department. Plaintiff’s conviction was vacated based on a showing of prosecutorial misconduct (People v Colon, 13 NY3d 343 [2009]), after he had served nearly 20 years in prison. Since plaintiff’s federal and state tort claims against the City all arose in New York County, where the alleged misconduct occurred and where he was arrested and prosecuted, the motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 504 (3) was properly granted, notwithstanding that he was held in Rikers Island in Bronx County for 20 months prior to and during the criminal trial (see Thames v New York City Police Dept., 105 AD3d 481 [1st Dept 2013]; Smith v City of New York, 60 AD3d 540 [1st Dept 2009]).

Although plaintiff also alleges that he suffered physical injury *454 when he was attacked by an inmate at Rikers Island, that incident does not form the basis of any distinct claim against the City based on misconduct of City officials occurring in Bronx County (see Thames, 105 AD3d 481; compare Rodriguez v City of New York, 92 AD3d 596 [1st Dept 2012]). Plaintiffs tangential allegation in support of his federal civil rights claims, that the Police Department was deliberately indifferent to a pattern of similar police misconduct, including misconduct in other cases occurring in the Bronx, is an insufficient basis for finding that his own claims arose in Bronx County.

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendant Codella’s motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County pursuant to CPLR 504 (3), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for malicious prosecution and violation of his civil rights under 42 USC § 1983, alleging that he was wrongfully convicted of a murder he did not commit based on serious misconduct by the individual defendants, then employed by the New York City Housing Authority and New York City Police Department. Plaintiff’s conviction was vacated based on a showing of prosecutorial misconduct (People v Colon, 13 NY3d 343 [2009]), after he had served nearly 20 years in prison. Since plaintiff’s federal and state tort claims against the City all arose in New York County, where the alleged misconduct occurred and where he was arrested and prosecuted, the motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 504 (3) was properly granted, notwithstanding that he was held in Rikers Island in Bronx County for 20 months prior to and during the criminal trial (see Thames v New York City Police Dept., 105 AD3d 481 [1st Dept 2013]; Smith v City of New York, 60 AD3d 540 [1st Dept 2009]).

Although plaintiff also alleges that he suffered physical injury *454 when he was attacked by an inmate at Rikers Island, that incident does not form the basis of any distinct claim against the City based on misconduct of City officials occurring in Bronx County (see Thames, 105 AD3d 481; compare Rodriguez v City of New York, 92 AD3d 596 [1st Dept 2012]). Plaintiffs tangential allegation in support of his federal civil rights claims, that the Police Department was deliberately indifferent to a pattern of similar police misconduct, including misconduct in other cases occurring in the Bronx, is an insufficient basis for finding that his own claims arose in Bronx County.

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 453, 998 N.Y.S.2d 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-codella-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack