Ortiz v. City of New York
This text of 101 A.D.3d 446 (Ortiz v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action for personal injuries sustained by the then 13-year-old plaintiff while playing basketball on an outdoor court at a park owned by defendant City of New York, defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based on the doctrine of assumption of risk (see Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 482-486 [1997]). The risks assumed by the infant plaintiff included those created by the gaps in the playing surface. In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Feinman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.3d 446, 954 N.Y.2d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2012.