Ortiz v. Bledsoe

Fourth Circuit

Ortiz v. Bledsoe

175 F. App'x 611

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2006·No. No. 06-6253·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortiz v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-512-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We grant Ortiz’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortiz v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-512-7 (W.D.Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We grant Ortiz’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Ortiz v. Bledsoe, 175 F. App'x 611 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

175 F. App'x 611 (Ortiz v. Bledsoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related