Ortiz v. Bledsoe

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 10, 2006
• Docket: 06-6253
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6253

CARLOS ORTIZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BLEDSOE, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lee County,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-512-7)

Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order

dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Ortiz v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-512-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We

grant Ortiz’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -