Ortiz v. Beautiful Village Associates & Redevelopment Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ortiz v. Beautiful Village Associates & Redevelopment Co.

16 A.D.3d 154, 790 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2238

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 2005·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered December 10, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff testified at her deposition that she fell as she descended a staircase in defendant’s building. Plaintiff could not state where she was on the staircase when she fell, how she fell, or what caused her to fall. Plaintiff did not notice any defects or problems with the steps themselves. Since she failed to establish any negligence on defendant’s part that might have proximately caused her injuries, defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Segretti v Shorenstein Co., E., 256 AD2d 234, 235 [1998]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered December 10, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff testified at her deposition that she fell as she descended a staircase in defendant’s building. Plaintiff could not state where she was on the staircase when she fell, how she fell, or what caused her to fall. Plaintiff did not notice any defects or problems with the steps themselves. Since she failed to establish any negligence on defendant’s part that might have proximately caused her injuries, defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Segretti v Shorenstein Co., E., 256 AD2d 234, 235 [1998]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Ortiz v. Beautiful Village Associates & Redevelopment Co., 16 A.D.3d 154, 790 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

16 A.D.3d 154 (Ortiz v. Beautiful Village Associates & Redevelopment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related