Ortiz Santos v. Reynolds
This text of Ortiz Santos v. Reynolds (Ortiz Santos v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Julio Leonal Ortiz Santos, ) and Margarita Santos Juarez ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. S23C-12-025 MHC ) v. ) ) Yolanda Reynolds and ) Gwendolyn Smack ) ) Defendants. ) )
ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO TRANSFER
Now this 19th day of February, 2024, upon review of Plaintiffs’ Petition for Writ of
Ejectment and statements made by both parties to the Court on Friday, February 16, 2024, it is
obvious to the Court that this is a boundary line dispute requiring an action to quiet title. Actions
to quiet title are within the sole jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery and cannot be heard as Writs
of Ejectment in this Court.1 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Writ of
Ejectment is DISMISSED in its entirety with leave to transfer pursuant to 10 Del. C. §1902.
/s/ Mark H. Conner Mark H. Conner, Judge
cc: Prothonotary Dean Campbell, Esquire Yolanda Reynolds
1 Cook v. Deep Hole Creek Associates, 2021 WL 1561410 (Del. Super. April 21, 2021).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ortiz Santos v. Reynolds, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-santos-v-reynolds-delsuperct-2024.