Ortiz-Sanchez v. Steidel-Figueroa

CourtDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedOctober 12, 2023
Docket3:21-cv-01433
StatusUnknown

This text of Ortiz-Sanchez v. Steidel-Figueroa (Ortiz-Sanchez v. Steidel-Figueroa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortiz-Sanchez v. Steidel-Figueroa, (prd 2023).

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

MARITZA ORTIZ-SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs,

v. Civ. No. 21-01433 (MAJ)

SIGFRIDO STEIDEL-FIGUEROA, et al.,

Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") issued by Magistrate Judge Bruce J. McGiverin, (ECF No. 86) recommending the Court grant Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. (ECF Nos. 32, 41, 42). The R & R was issued on September 26, 2023, and objections were due by October 11, 2023. No objections have been filed. After reviewing the R & R, and all the pleadings on the record, the Court finds the R & R well-reasoned, grounded in fact and law, and free of “plain error.” See M. v. Falmouth School Department, 847 F.3d 19, 25 (1st Cir. 2017) (“Absent objection ... a district court has a right to assume that the affected party agrees to the magistrate's recommendation.”) (cleaned up); Nogueras-Cartagena v. United States, 172 F.Supp.2d 296, 305 (D.P.R. 2001) (“Court reviews [unopposed] Magistrate's Report and Recommendation to ascertain whether or not the Magistrate's recommendation was clearly erroneous.”). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 32, 41, 42) are GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 and supplemental state claims against Rosa- Pimentel, her spouse, and their conjugal partnership are DISMISSED

with prejudice. 3. Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 claims against Steidel-Figueroa and Villares are DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Plaintiffs’ supplemental state claims against Steidel-Figueroa and Villares are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 12th day of October, 2023. S/ María Antongiorgi-Jordán MARÍA ANTONGIORGI-JORDÁN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nogueras-Cartagena v. United States
172 F. Supp. 2d 296 (D. Puerto Rico, 2001)
Ms. M. v. Falmouth School Department
847 F.3d 19 (First Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ortiz-Sanchez v. Steidel-Figueroa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-sanchez-v-steidel-figueroa-prd-2023.