Ortiz-Sanchez v. Gonzales
This text of 214 F. App'x 681 (Ortiz-Sanchez v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner is not entitled to relief from the current removal order because he doesn’t contest that he reentered the country without permission from the Attorney General. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 633 F.2d 174, 176 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam); Hernandez-Almanza v. INS, 547 F.2d 100, 102 (9th Cir.1976). Nor may he collaterally attack his prior removal order during the course of these proceedings. See Ramirez-Juarez, 633 F.2d at 176; see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(d).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-sanchez-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.