Ortiz, Oscar Orlando

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 18, 2015
DocketWR-81,487-01
StatusPublished

This text of Ortiz, Oscar Orlando (Ortiz, Oscar Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortiz, Oscar Orlando, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

•'

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CERTIFIED COPIES OF

POST CONVICTION

FROM: 182N° DISTRICT COURT

OF

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

RECE~VED~N COURT OF CRtMINAl APPEAlS OSCAR ORLANDO ORTIZ MAR 18 2015

APPLICANT Ab&J Acosta, Cf®rk

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

RESPONDENT

CAUSE #1150848-A PAGE I OF I REV. 01-02-04 INDEX PAGE

LETTER FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TO RESPOND IN 10 DAYS TO PREVIOUS MANDAMUS ORDER

WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 2

DISTRICT ATTORNEY ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER 4

STATE'S PROPOSED ORDER DESIGNATING ISSUES AND FOR ~ILING 5 AFFIDAVIT

LETTER TO APPLICANT 10

CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK 11

PAGE I OF I REV: 01-02-04 l'lLC vVI' 1

SHARON KELLER ABEL ACOSTA PRESIDING JUDGE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK (512) 463-1551 P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION LAWRENCE E. MEYERS CHERYL JOHNSON AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 SIAN SCHILHAB MIKE KEASLER GENERAL COUNSEL BARBARA P. HERVEY (512)463-1597 ELSA ALCALA BERT RICHARDSON KEVIN P. YEARY DAVID NEWELL JUDGES

March 12, 2015

District Clerk Harris County Chris Daniel Post Conviction/Appeals Section P.O. Box 4651 FIL~D Chris oanle\ Houston, TX 77210-4651 District Clerk * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * MAR 13 20l5 Re: Ortiz, Oscar Orlando CCA No. WR-81,487-01 Trial Court Case No. 1150848-A

Dear Clerk:

On July 9, 2014 this Court entered an order requiring you to respond within 30 days by either presenting an Order Designating Issues, submitting the application for Writ of Habeas Corpus to this Court, or by certifying that no application was filed. A copy of said order is available on our website under the above referenced writ number. To date no response to this order has been received.

Please take action within the next ten days to explain why you have not complied with the order of July 9, 2014.

cc: Oscar Orlando Ortiz SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 20 I WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM I 06, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA.ASPX

.~.di"'!!II.~.J'I"!lll...olr

,~!l£J!;!.l!~::!L IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,487-01

1N RE OSCAR ORLANDO ORTIZ, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 1150848-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCreev. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578,579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that -2-

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the response

include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney's office was served with

the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file

a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: July 9, 2014 Do not publish Belinda Hill Criminal Justice Center Interim First Assistant 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002-1901

HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY MIKE ANDERSON

July 8, 2013

Chris Daniel, District Clerk Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin Houston, Texas 77002 Re: Ex parte OSCAR ORLANDO ORTIZ No. 1150848-A in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas Filing date: 07-05-13

Date copy of writ delivered to District Attorney's Basket: JUL 0 8 2013 By: Leslie Hernandez

Dear Sir:

I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the above-captioned post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure .. Therefore, I waive service by certified mail as provided therein.

I understand that I have 15 days from the date received to answer.

~:~~ ( . .e. kfo~ ·: Date Received ' . ·.

Harris County, Texas I "'AsSiStantDf~tri~t Att~~ey__ ...... ./"

'.. ' . FILED Chris Daniel District Clerk Cause No. 1150848-A JUL 1 2 2013 EX PARTE §

§

OSCAR ORLANDO ORTIZ, § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Applicant

STATE'S PROPOSED ORDER DESIGNATING ISSUES AND FOR FILING AFFIDAVIT

Having considered the application for writ of habeas corpus in the above-

captioned cause and the State's original answer, the Court finds that the issue of

whether the applicant was denied effective assistance of counsel and whether the

applicant's plea was voluntary still needs to be resolved in the present case.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 11.07, §3(d), this Court will resolve the above-cited

issue and then enter findings of fact.

To assist the Court in resolving these factual issues, counsel Alvin Nunnery is

ORDERED to file an affidavit summarizing his actions as counsel for the applican~ in the

primary case, cause number 1150848-A, and specifically responding to the following:

1. Did Nunnery ever represent to the applicant that, upon his plea of guilty to the State charges, the applicant would be returned to Federal custody?

2. Did Nunnery ever represent to the applicant that, upon his plea of guilty to the State charges, the applicant's State and Federal sentences would run concurrently?

3. What advice did Nunnery give to the applicant regarding entering his plea and whether the State and Federal sentences would run concurrently?

4. What precipitated the notation on the judgment that the State and Federal sentences were to run concurrently? (Specifically, did Nunnery ask the judge to make that notation? At what point during the plea process did Nunnery ask for the notation? Had Nunnery advised the applicant before the plea that the court would definitely make such a notation? Had Nunnery advised the applicant that ->s: G') if the court made the notation, it would be binding?) m c 1 5. Did the court ever represent to the applicant that she had the power to order that the applicant's State and Federal sentences run concurrently?

6. Does Nunnery believe that the applicant agreed to plead guilty due to a false impression and/or promise that the sentences would run concurrently? If so, who gave the applicant the false impression or made the false promise?

2 ' . ORDER

Alvin Nunnery is ORDERED to file said affidavit with the Post-Conviction Writs

Division of the District Clerk's Office, 1201 Franklin, Third Floor, Houston, Texas 77002,

within THIRTY DAYS of the signing of this Order.

The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to send a copy of this Order to the applicant

and to the State, and to serve copies of this Order, the State's Answer, and the Original

application:

Mr. Alvin Nunnery 909 Texas Street, Ste. 205 Houston, Texas 77002-3149

When the affidavit of Alvin Nunnery is received, the Clerk is ORDERED to send a

copy of said affidavit to the applicant, Oscar Orlando Ortiz, #1525993 - Lynaugh Unit,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCree v. Hampton
824 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ortiz, Oscar Orlando, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-oscar-orlando-texapp-2015.