ORTIZ-OLIVO v. State
This text of 962 So. 2d 939 (ORTIZ-OLIVO v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eleuterio ORTIZ-OLIVO, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Eleuterio Ortiz-Olivo, Bowling Green, pro se.
No response required for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Eleuterio Ortiz-Olivo filed a petition alleging that his appointed post-conviction counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to raise a certain issue. Ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel, however, is not a cognizable claim. See Kokal v. State, 901 So.2d 766, 777 (Fla.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 983, 126 S.Ct. 560, 163 L.Ed.2d 471 (2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
FARMER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 So. 2d 939, 2007 WL 2043480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-olivo-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.