ORTIZ, LUCIANO, PEOPLE v
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1241 KA 09-00166 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUCIANO ORTIZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered November 28, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [former (3)]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence inasmuch as he made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). In addition, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime in this nonjury trial (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We also conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ORTIZ, LUCIANO, PEOPLE v (ORTIZ, LUCIANO, PEOPLE v) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.