Ortiz-Lopez v. State

153 So. 3d 313, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19105, 2014 WL 6601665
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2014·No. 2D13-1126·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Samuel Ortiz-Lopez appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree murder. We conclude that the trial court’s denial of his motion for continuance did not result in a palpable abuse of discretion. See Chavez v. State, 48 So.3d 1022, 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing M.D.B. v. State, 952 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)). Likewise, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in the admission of testimony concerning Ortiz-Lopez’s prior possession of a firearm. Cf. Agatheas v. State, 77 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz-Lopez v. State, 153 So. 3d 313, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19105, 2014 WL 6601665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

153 So. 3d 313 (Ortiz-Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chavez v. State
48 So. 3d 1022 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Agatheas v. State
77 So. 3d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
M.D.B. v. State
952 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)