Ortiz-Lopez v. State
This text of 153 So. 3d 313 (Ortiz-Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel Ortiz-Lopez appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree murder. We conclude that the trial court’s denial of his motion for continuance did not result in a palpable abuse of discretion. See Chavez v. State, 48 So.3d 1022, 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing M.D.B. v. State, 952 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)). Likewise, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in the admission of testimony concerning Ortiz-Lopez’s prior possession of a firearm. Cf. Agatheas v. State, 77 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 So. 3d 313, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19105, 2014 WL 6601665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-lopez-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.