Ortiz, Emir
This text of Ortiz, Emir (Ortiz, Emir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,096-01
EX PARTE EMIR ORTIZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20170D02908-34-1 IN THE 346TH DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping (count I), aggravated assault with a deadly
weapon (count II), family-violence assault by impeding breathing or circulation (count III), and
continuous family violence. Applicant originally received deferred adjudication and was placed on
community supervision. Applicant’s deferred status was adjudicated, and he was sentenced to thirty
years’ imprisonment on each of the four counts, to run concurrently. Applicant did not appeal his
convictions. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,
and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that his thirty-year sentences for counts II, III, and
IV are illegal and that counsel was ineffective for failing to object when the trial judge imposed those 2
sentences. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Pue, 552
S.W.3d 226, 228 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); Ex parte Parrott, 396 S.W.3d 531, 534 (Tex. Crim. App.
2013); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be
developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In
developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). It appears
that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is
indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent
Applicant at the hearing.. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s
sentences were illegal, including whether the trial judge’s pronounced sentence(s) is/are correctly
reflected in the judgements adjudicating guilt. The trial court shall also make specific findings and
conclusions as to whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced.
The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response
to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: October 20, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ortiz, Emir, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-emir-texcrimapp-2021.