Ortiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
This text of 697 F. App'x 6 (Ortiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge Rogers.
This cause came to be heard on the record of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. The matter was reconsidered, s/m spcmte, by the panel after the filing of a petition for rehearing en banc and the response. On consideration thereof, it is
ORDERED that the opinion and judgment issued August 2, 2016, be vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be reversed and the case be remanded for further proceedings, in accordance with the opinion issued herein this date.
Opinion concurring in the judgment by Circuit Judge Henderson.
Concurring Opinion by Circuit Judge Rogers.
Concurring Opinion by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 F. App'x 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-diaz-v-united-states-department-of-housing-urban-development-cadc-2017.