Ortiz (Carlos) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 2013·No. 61290·Unpublished

Opinion

563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

J.

Hardesty

- c2.4.)t Parraguirre

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Carlos Ortiz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) 1947A •

ElitiMiCan1111111ffill EMIR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz (Carlos) v. State, (Neb. 2013).

Ortiz (Carlos) v. State (Ortiz (Carlos) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. State
1 P.3d 969 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)